From: "Massimo S." <virtualized_ecs_users@2rosenthals.com>
Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com)
  by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.10)
  with ESMTPS id 257349 for virtualized_ecs_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 15:54:26 -0500
Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([50.73.8.217]:46898 helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com)
	by mail.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX)
	(envelope-from <ml@ecomstation.it>)
	id 1isYdI-0002ao-2r
	for virtualized_ecs_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 15:54:21 -0500
Received: from mail2.quasarbbs.net ([80.86.52.115]:10082)
	by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX)
	(envelope-from <ml@ecomstation.it>)
	id 1isYd7-0004F7-2d
	for virtualized_ecs_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 15:54:10 -0500
Received: from [192.168.10.199] (dtp [192.168.10.199]) by srv2 (Weasel v2.71)
  for <virtualized_ecs_users@2rosenthals.com>; 17 Jan 2020 21:54:09 
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A02020E.5E221EFD.0001,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020208.5E221EF2.0016,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0
Reply-To: ml@ecomstation.it
Subject: Re: [Virtualized eCS] Virtual box 6.0.14 r 133895 AOS 5.0.3 tcpip
 issue
To: Virtualized eCS Users Mailing List <virtualized_ecs_users@2rosenthals.com>
References: <list-249527@2rosenthals.com> <list-251198@2rosenthals.com>
 <list-251457@2rosenthals.com> <list-251540@2rosenthals.com>
 <list-251906@2rosenthals.com> <list-252008@2rosenthals.com>
 <list-252891@2rosenthals.com> <list-252947@2rosenthals.com>
 <list-255235@2rosenthals.com> <list-256166@2rosenthals.com>
 <list-256499@2rosenthals.com> <list-256596@2rosenthals.com>
 <list-256678@2rosenthals.com>
 <ce114d37-f94a-7386-2884-e8a84ba9db79@ecomstation.it>
 <list-256845@2rosenthals.com> <list-257061@2rosenthals.com>
 <list-257191@2rosenthals.com>
 <b50f70f0-a47e-c323-f098-75c776e16fe4@ecomstation.it>
 <77f77f1a-3a80-cc52-b8d7-3fe15add4cc3@ecomstation.it>
Organization: eComStation dot it
Message-ID: <e2a27520-3c17-37d8-947e-3cddf5c1b5c4@ecomstation.it>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 21:54:07 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; it-IT; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060424
 Thunderbird/1.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <77f77f1a-3a80-cc52-b8d7-3fe15add4cc3@ecomstation.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: it-IT
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



Il 17/01/2020 21:44, Massimo S. ha scritto:
> 
> 
> Il 17/01/2020 21:09, Massimo S. ha scritto:
>>
>>
>> Il 17/01/2020 19:42, Doug Bissett ha scritto:
>>> On 2020-01-17, at 18:12:36, Massimo S. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> now there is a new issue :D
>>>>
>>>> if i transfer a big file, after about 20 seconds the IP stop to
>>>> communicate
>>>> and you can't even ping it from another pc in the lan...
>>>>
>>>> anyone had the same experience?
>>>>
>>>> massimo
>>>
>>> Have you still got 2 CPUs defined? Use only one.
>>
>> no Doug, it's not
>>
>> it's all the afternoon that i'm running with just one CPU
>> and i've the stack ip that works completely randomly
>>
>> (also see that with 2 cores i ftp at 8MB/sec
>> with one core at 4MB/sec it's not acceptable speed
>> so if my speed is limited to 4MB/sec i will not use virtual box at all)
>>
>> i've seen before this kind of issues
>> in the past there were IRQ conflicts (on bare metal)
>>
>> massimo
> 
> update
> 
> i've put up again the AMD PCNet-FAST III and as a "miracle" :)
> the tcpip is back to work perfectly
> 
> 1 core : 4,4MegaBytes/sec ftp datarate
> 2 cores: 7,4MegaBytes/sec ftp datarate

i add even more details

4 cores:   11,7MegaBytes/sec ftp datarate
i'd say full 100Megabit full duplex datarate


massimo

> for my needs 4,4MB/sec is not acceptable, too much slow for a server
> expecially when they have to bkup GB of data...
> 
> so the problem is not the multi core configuration
> the problem is the intel pro 1000 virtual nic
> 
> maybe the drivers i've used E1000.OS2 and E1000_C.OS2
> 
> i'd use E1000B.OS2 (multimac32) but it's not compatible
> 
> any suggestion for the best driver to use in the guest VM for the Intel pro 1000?
> 
> thanks
> 
> massimo

i add: