From: "Sam Lewis" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com)
  by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16)
  with ESMTP id 2297483 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:28:42 -0400
Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([162.83.95.194] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com)
	by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.43)
	id 1NwJhY-0004D0-VV
	for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:28:42 -0400
Received: from mail-bw0-f226.google.com ([209.85.218.226]:35734)
	by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <saml@rollanet.org>)
	id 1NwJhN-00079g-1m
	for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:28:29 -0400
Received: by bwz26 with SMTP id 26so6022117bwz.7
        for <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020209.4BB0F14D.0209,ss=1,fgs=0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.100.146 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [71.42.191.58]
In-Reply-To: <list-2297456@2rosenthals.com>
References: <list-2297456@2rosenthals.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 13:28:26 -0500
Received: by 10.204.46.153 with SMTP id j25mr6739951bkf.191.1269887306855; 
	Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <438498021003291128j6a6adbc8v3cd35047a105c418@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Hotel problem with Asus wl-330ge
To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Dave Saville
<os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 13:09:19 -0500 Sam Lewis wrote:
> <snip>
>
>>So is your AP going from the hotels wired to wifi to your laptop? or
>>Hotel Wifi to the wired card on your laptop?.
>
> The latter.

That would be the wrong configuration for an AP.  You need to use it
as a bridge so that it is a wifi client and then have it go to your
wired port on your laptop.  Then you could use MAC address cloning in
necessary, probably not, if they didn't want to assign you two IP
addresses, one for your bridge and one for your wired NIC.

AP aren't designed to bridge.  I think Lewis told me a few years ago
if one did that then the AP's couldn't be used to connect any other
clients and that they would be locked to each other only.  So that may
be why it didn't work.

Did this configuration ever work?
Sam