From: "Dave Saville" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 2297387 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 13:58:12 -0400 Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([162.83.95.194] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1NwJE2-0003jF-SM for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 13:58:12 -0400 Received: from mail.deezee.org.uk ([81.187.184.98]:50066) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwJDt-0006qS-1o for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 13:58:02 -0400 Received: from bearpaw.bear.den (bearpaw.bear.den [192.168.0.201]) by mail.deezee.org.uk (Weasel v1.804) for ; 29 Mar 2010 18:57:57 -0000 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020204.4BB0EA29.0335,ss=1,fgs=0 Message-ID: <000.1861040012eab04b.022@deezee.org> To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:57:38 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: References: Priority: Normal User-Agent: PMMail/3.07 (os/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-GB; i386; ver 3.07.12.1509) X-Mailer: (Demonstration) PMMail (Alpha 2) 3.07.12.1509 for OS/2 Warp 4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Hotel problem with Asus wl-330ge On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:25:22 -0500 Sam Lewis wrote: >On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Dave Saville > wrote: >> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:57:08 -0500 Sam Lewis wrote: >>>Dave, >>>I doubt that it would have a problem routing your packets unless you >>>had an IP address conflict.  Your router would still be partaking in >>>two different networks and NAT'ing between them and your router would >>>have it's 24 bit subnet mask so any traffic from your laptop which >>>would have been outside it's network would still go to the gateway and >>>then in turn to it's gateway. >>> >>>Also I doubt that in reality they would have been using a 16 bit >>>subnet on a class on a class C range. >>> >>>Did you have any problems? >>> >>>The only problems I have had in hotels is that sometimes the gateway >>>IP address is outside the network of the IP address they assign to my >>>system.  In Windoze this doesn't seem to be an issue as it seems happy >>>with a gateway outside it's subnet but in OS/2, Linux and OS9 (Embeded >>>RTOS not Mac) this isn't allowed.  So I have to static IP my laptop >>>and massage the subnet mask. >>>My $0.02 worth, >> Hi Sam >> >> Yes I did have a problem in that using the Asus in AP mode I could not >> get to the web page to put in the authentication details because I did >> not get an address -  but every time I tried to get into the Asus it >> diverted to a "can't resolve something in the hotel network" popup. >> Putting my old Artem card in worked perfectly. >> > >Dave, >Another thought about AP's. I have two AP's and two Bridges on my >network and they all are on the wrong network. I have rearranged my >IP scheme a few times over the last 10 years and they are now on the >incorrect network, however they pass traffic to my computers and >printer just fine, which are on the correct network. > >So if your AP has a static IP you would have to static IP your laptop >to the same network to reconfigure it. I would think that the wifi >traffic from your laptop would still have gotten to your AP's wired >port and onto the hotels network even though it is static IP'd on a >different subnet. Unless of course there was a IP address conflict. > >Again this is all subjective and just my opinion so it may not be worth much. Sam Sorry my fault, when I said AP I meant access mode - ie like a card. Asus can do router/bridge/AP/card. I don't think in that mode it gets an address itself. The laptop did not get an address. *Something* was confusing the routing inside the Asus. At least that was what it appeared. -- Regards Dave Saville