From: "Frank Vos" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Received: from mxout2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.166] verified)
  by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.3)
  with ESMTP id 833704 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 09:52:58 -0500
Received: from mxin2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.176])
	by mxout2.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <frankvos@xs4all.nl>)
	id 1HGG4E-0005Kv-9c
	for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 09:52:41 -0500
Received: from smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.24])
	by mxin2.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <frankvos@xs4all.nl>)
	id 1HGG4E-000NO9-1c
	for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 09:52:38 -0500
Received: from T23.lan (a80-126-60-28.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.126.60.28])
	by smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1BEqbZ0073987
	for <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:52:37 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from frankvos@xs4all.nl)
Message-Id: <200702111452.l1BEqbZ0073987@smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl>
To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:52:34 +0100 (CET)
Reply-To: "Frank Vos" <frankvos@xs4all.nl>
Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: PMMail/2 2.20.2382 voor eComStation 1.2 NL
In-Reply-To: <list-833654@2rosenthals.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: Netlabs
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS
X-Originating-IP: 194.109.24.24
X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/)

Hello Rick,
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 06:14:49 -0800 (PST), Rick R. wrote:

>I think that's highly appropriate.
>Not just because running an eCS/OS/2 group on
>none-OS/2 systems would make the whole thing the
>laughing stock of the Internet, but also because
>Windoze servers are known to intentionally mess up
>none-Windoze systems by introducing just enough
>none-standard overhead into protocols to make all hell
>breal loose.
They are not using a window server, but BSD.

>From the same newsletter:

Server:

After years of running the web server on OS/2 I decided to move to FreeBSD 
as a server OS for various reasons which I would like to explain because 
some people do not seem to understand that:

  - My daytime job is administrating servers, most servers I run are 
FreeBSD so I know this OS pretty well
  - netlabs.org provides mainly software for the desktop. I prefer to 
invest time in organizing netlabs.org itself than debugging issues on the 
server just because most of the software I run on the server are made for 
Unix (TRAC, Subversion, Apache...) and might not work on OS/2 that easy
  - I do much more on this server than just providing basic services like a 
little bit of PHP & MySQL. We use quite a bunch of software on this server, 
see http://wiki.netlabs.org/index.php/R2-d2 if you are interested in the 
details
  - FreeBSD works just fine on this dualcore AMD CPU and because the server 
is in Hamburg (Germany) and I live in Biel (Switzerland) I didn't feel like 
experimenting on new hardware
  - we simply have much more important things to discuss than the OS of 
netlabs.org. Talk about Voyager for example! :-)


Kind regards,
Frank