From: Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 2247350 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:48:33 -0500 Received: from secmgr-va.randr ([192.168.200.201] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1NltoF-0000CH-GS for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:48:33 -0500 Received: from mx-02mtaout01.mts.net ([142.161.131.3]:9047) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nlto7-0003QC-0I for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:48:23 -0500 Received: from wnpgmb021pw-sp03.mts.net ([10.204.128.23]) by mx-02mtaout01.mts.net with ESMTP id <20100301004821.VQBX3908.mx-02mtaout01.mts.net@wnpgmb021pw-sp03.mts.net> for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:48:21 -0600 Received: from brndmb02dc1-193-60.dynamic.mts.net (HELO smtp.mts.net) ([216.55.193.60]) by wnpgmb021pw-sp03.mts.net with SMTP; 28 Feb 2010 18:48:21 -0600 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020201.4B8B0ED7.00C0,ss=1,fgs=0 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAI+dikvYN8E8/2dsb2JhbACZQ35bdL1dBA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,557,1262584800"; d="scan'208";a="127693604" To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Post Road Mailer for OS/2 (Green Edition Ver 3.0) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:48:12 MST Reply-To: os24u@wisdomtree.info Subject: Nic/router speed drop Message-Id: <20100301004821.VQBX3908.mx-02mtaout01.mts.net@wnpgmb021pw-sp03.mts.net> My several month problem of local lan speeds through Linksys router suddenly dropping from 25-30Mbits to 56k modem speed occurred again. Internet side never changed much, LAN could zoom or crawl. Followed Lewis's advice that Linksys was burning up and replaced with new Dynex. With LInksys today get sometimes crawl speed, other times relatively normal and lockups on ftp transfer on local side. With Dynex get intial faster speeds and almost immediate lockup. Thought occured perhaps nic's were not on same network speed. Began modifying .nif files for each card as below. From Accton chip nif: [MEDIA] display = "Physical Medium Type" type = String strlength = 14 ; default = "AUTODETECT" default = "UTP_100" set = AUTODETECT, UTP, UTP_FD, UTP_100,UTP_100FD Intel and Admtek also set same. Tried full duplex 100 first. Does above look suitable? Is Autodetect better? 4 months ago everything cruised along so something changed. On suggestion from this list ran Netio as follows with Accton chip as client. Do these speeds appear normal? Machines with Intel and Accton worked fine in previous months. Admtek recent addition and it could be swapped for other chipset. NETIO - Network Throughput Benchmark, Version 1.26 Intel Pro100 nic TCP connection established. Packet size 1k bytes: 10298 KByte/s Tx, 7621 KByte/s Rx. Packet size 2k bytes: 11414 KByte/s Tx, 7636 KByte/s Rx. Packet size 4k bytes: 11427 KByte/s Tx, 7616 KByte/s Rx. Packet size 8k bytes: 11278 KByte/s Tx, 7624 KByte/s Rx. Packet size 16k bytes: 11268 KByte/s Tx, 7471 KByte/s Rx. Packet size 32k bytes: 11319 KByte/s Tx, 7581 KByte/s Rx. Admtek nic TCP connection established. Packet size 1k bytes: 8624 KByte/s Tx, 8091 KByte/s Rx. Packet size 2k bytes: 9819 KByte/s Tx, 8335 KByte/s Rx. Packet size 4k bytes: 10513 KByte/s Tx, 9765 KByte/s Rx. Packet size 8k bytes: 11113 KByte/s Tx, 10024 KByte/s Rx. Packet size 16k bytes: 11158 KByte/s Tx, 9597 KByte/s Rx. Packet size 32k bytes: 11104 KByte/s Tx, 8804 KByte/s Rx. Since switch of router problem changed. One part better, something else worse. Is there a tool to determine what connect speed 2 nics connect at? Cal http://www.wisdomtree.info Largest OS/2 applications and articles URL database