X-UIDL: 1493 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: os2-wireless_users-owner@2rosenthals.com Received: from mail.2rosenthals.com (localhost [127.0.0.1] ) by mail.2rosenthals.com (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 23:09:50 -0400 Received: from mail1.no-ip.com (goodyear.vitalwerks.com [64.156.198.155] ) by mail.2rosenthals.com (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 23:09:48 -0400 X-Envelope-To: Received: (qmail 15101 invoked by uid 89); 2 Sep 2003 03:09:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO tisch.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.157) by mail1.no-ip.com with SMTP; 2 Sep 2003 03:09:33 -0000 Received: from user-2injr5s.dialup.mindspring.com ([165.121.236.188] helo=hyder.org) by tisch.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19u1Y9-0003BG-00 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 01 Sep 2003 23:09:46 -0400 Message-ID: <3F5409F8.5030707@hyder.org> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3F4F99E1.50002@hyder.org> <3F50EEB1.4030505@2rosenthals.com> <3F53A326.8010907@hyder.org> <3F53E66E.5070609@2rosenthals.com> In-Reply-To: <3F53E66E.5070609@2rosenthals.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 23:09:44 -0400 Sender: os2-wireless_users-owner X-Listname: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Reply-To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com From: Ray Hyder To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Subject: [OS2Wireless] NetGear MA311 X-List-Unsubscribe: Send email to mailusers-request@2rosenthals.com X-List-Owner: mailusers-owner@2rosenthals.com Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: > > I wasn't referring to a parabolic antenna, merely a reflector. You > could make one yourself by cutting a coffee can (ain't this stuff > fun?). For some nice ideas, check out > http://osiris.urbanna.net/antenna_designs/projects/template. Outstanding link! I have some background in antenna theory and construction. The design looks like it would work in the ideal environment. From a practical standpoint a parabolic reflector on the back of a full tower might not be doable because of the density of the cable population and in any case a reflector would be dependent on the orientation of the tower to the WAP. Got to have omni directional capability... Or an antenna that I can can remote and play with directionality. >> and for less money I could simply dig a trench between the two >> buildings and drop in a Cat 5 cable and run at 100 Mbps. It would >> be less than half the price and 10 times the speed... Why not? >> Don't need the speed for the application I have and I'm now >> fascinated with WiFi... :-) > > > I'm not looking to increase bandwidth (you'd need 802.11a or g, at > this point), just try to make up the signal loss for you. Lewis, the D-Link router I have is a "g" so it has the bandwidth. You are right, the problem is signal strength. We will see what happens when th e new antenna comes in... Thanks for the input! - ray -- Ray Hyder PO Box 448 Georgetown, Georgia 39854-0448 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body (omit the quotes). For help with other commands, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "help" in the body (omit the quotes). =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=