From: "Dave Saville" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.3) with ESMTP id 1595756 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:04:34 -0500 Received-SPF: pass (secmgr-ny.randr: domain of deezee.org designates 81.187.184.98 as permitted sender) client-ip=81.187.184.98; envelope-from=dave@deezee.org; helo=mail.deezee.org.uk; Received: from mail.deezee.org.uk ([81.187.184.98]) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JFwVv-0004eg-Ua for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:04:30 -0500 Received: from paddington ([192.168.0.200] [192.168.0.200]) by mail.deezee.org.uk (Weasel v1.77) for ; 18 Jan 2008 19:04:15 Message-ID: <010-2bf89047-24678.015@deezee.org> To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:04:11 +0000 (GMT) Priority: Normal User-Agent: PMMail/2.90 (os/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-GB; i386; ver 2.90.04.0859) X-Mailer:(Demonstration) PMMail (RC 1) 2.90.04.0859 for OS/2 Warp 4.5 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Logging network activity from VPC X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:56:45 -0500 (EST), Hakan wrote: >Dave, > >I wsas hoping that the 'net traffic originated by the Win application >running in VPC would then be "managed" by the host operating system, >i.e., eCS 1.2MR in my case, and that a program that logs all network >card traffic would log also this traffic. Given that I would not do >anything else on the 'net at the same time, I am hoping that it would >be feasible to figure out what the Win application sends and receives. iptrace should see it - provided you are not using virtual switch. I know that does *not* work. If using the NAT mode does not show up in iptrace then *nothing* you run on the host will see anything. As I said you will need a hub and a *nix box with snoop or similar on it. The reason you need a hub is that hubs send everything they get to all ports. Normally a box only acts on packets with it's own address in. A sniffer gets the NIC to pass everthing and that is how it sees the packets from the other machine. A switch OTH makes "virtual circuits" between it's ports because it "knows" what is connected to each. So a box can not see anything not directed at it. This is why, with a hub, a massive FTP between two boxes will kill performance for everything else. With a switch you don't notice anything - because you never see the FTP packets. HTH -- Regards Dave Saville