From: "Jeffrey Race" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 1954770 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:23:33 -0400 Received-SPF: none (secmgr-ny.randr: 12.154.55.31 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of attglobal.net) client-ip=12.154.55.31; envelope-from=jrace@attglobal.net; helo=kcout01.prserv.net; Received: from kcout01.prserv.net ([12.154.55.31]) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KIEeu-0003JW-IF for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:23:33 -0400 Received: from 600xjrnew60gb (ppp-61-91-172-247.revip.asianet.co.th[61.91.172.247]) by prserv.net (kcout01) with SMTP id <2008071403232620100ecgi8e> (Authid: usinet.jrace); Mon, 14 Jul 2008 03:23:27 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [61.91.172.247] To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 10:23:22 +0700 Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Standard (2.20.2717) For Windows 2000 (5.0.2195;4) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] OT: Using Xircom EE10BU on W2K help please X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: _SUMMARY_ Message-ID: On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 20:35:26 -0600, Chuck McKinnis wrote: >If the problem is in the cabling, does it make much difference which >port you use on the computer? I don't want to keep swapping PC cards as the mountings are not sufficiently robust. (This is a 600X).