From: "Rick R." Received: from mxout2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.166] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 629574 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:22:48 -0500 Received: from mxin2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.176]) by mxout2.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Gw7DL-0002W2-4n for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:22:47 -0500 Received: from web61221.mail.yahoo.com ([209.73.179.55]) by mxin2.mailhop.org with smtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Gw7DK-0007fO-Lt for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:22:46 -0500 Received: (qmail 5344 invoked by uid 60001); 18 Dec 2006 01:22:36 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=D+hc6TiB2toRrWcMWfmkQi0LCQNOXvJUJZ0BSdalNLf9Ur6diNnYclzyuSQB7nuDUiLUaA3C5oaXdDCdL8DJTfPQ2ynF0J10hO+vWabUnE+MXkZme5OJbMsOQ8+M/QpV96VIfh/cbhSSPDhXi74OI43WwxvDW4YJuJ7brECBtNI= ; Message-ID: <20061218012236.5342.qmail@web61221.mail.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: ISnaQ3UVM1l9UBqWU_EN1FXPbxFnnAUqRcSBa25e9IUDmlsPOGtHIu0.PT6INc6rw4BYVz81ELNViGpk2s3Mn8bP3sltYZObUiYiQZicu7vFSzVxUwZZFEb41y0De7V1f2OA2f9_RNJ5da9wuqf7ikzrqbyyFbnnKWJfifMnGluBTcTdBoVCmDm00qTXFms5XT10Da1L Received: from [65.211.134.99] by web61221.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 17:22:36 PST Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 17:22:36 -0800 (PST) Subject: Success Story To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 209.73.179.55 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Howdy Fellaws ! After many a trial and tribulation I'm finally back in the green again. After moving to my T43p, I got my sound back, wireleass, Accelerated Video and yes Wireless as well. I still have SOCKETS crashes, but after doing some more patching, those crashes now only happen once every 2-3 days and seem directly related to only the most heaviest of traffic. And once I power off the box before restarting it, I can run the rest of the day w/o it happening again. So I recon after doing a little bit more patching, I might get rid of those last leftovers as well. And after switching "ipgate on" in "setup.cmd", I can now also route my VPC sessions to the Internet. I'm in dream land with tons of SW, which now works again, that no Windoze system can touch me no more :-) And on top of all else, I found that the damn Windoze partition I (had to) use(d) took less than 3 weeks of Internet cruising to become totally corrupted beyond redemption. Damn, they are right when they say that the only time Microsoft would ever produce a product that doesn't suck is when they would start making vacuum cleaners. And then that Windows 2000 Pro install CD crashes with a Blue Screen of Death on my system *every* time. So much for bad-mouthing OS/2 install CDs. Now there is one grain of salt in this happy man's coffee. That xwlan tool, which used to work after many initial failures, is now back to its bad behaviour of always going past the last available NIC. So if my WiFi is on lan1, xwlan always(!) goes to lan2, which is empty. So I can't switch networks or use the encryption feature. I have upgraded XWLAN throughout this ordeal so many times, that I can't say any more when this error was re-introduced. That used to be the error in the earlier versions of XWLAN, then it worked, then I had to start moving my system and ended up applying upgrades & patches left, right and center. So who knows on which version of XWLAN I should fall back on now? Also, I found one way to resolve the error message with certain (Windoze?) DHCP servers over WiFi is to define the interface as static, using an IP address within the server's address range, and then switch back to TCP/IP. Using an OS/2 packet sniffer I found that this (windoze?) DHCP server seems to restrict its response to my system's DHCP request to a specific address within its range. Doesn't make much sense, since I'm trying to get a valid address in the first place with that DHCP request, but I think that's the main reason why I never "catch" the answere. So using a static address first and/or de/re-activating the WiFi NIC a few times then leads to success and no further problems as long as the connection stays up. If I don't transmit anything for some time, I'll have to go through the whole procedure again. --- Neil Waldhauer wrote: > On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:25:30 -0800, "altownsend" > wrote: > > > It is not the D-Link Router > > > > It is to get the T-40 to work on the wireless side > > I think Ed's right. You can get support for Windows > right from the manufacturer > (s). You don't know if the problem is the access > point or the laptop. > > My advice -- wireless works great for eCS. erase > Windows XP and replace with > eCS. Install GenMac and XWLan, and you should be > fine with the wireless > networking. > > Or at least you'll be using something that's on > topic for this list. > > Note: eCS works well in general. I have been trying > to use eCS in place of > Windows while running a business that works closely > with corporations that use > MS Office. I simply don't tell them I'm not running > Windows. If I don't mention > it, it just doesn't come up. > > Neil > -- > Neil Waldhauer, neil@blondeguy.com > > If it ain't broke, fix it till it is. > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > This message is sent to you because you are > subscribed to > the mailing list > . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to > > Send administrative queries to > > To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to: > and reply to > the confirmation email. > > This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal > P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- > electronic communications related to content > contained in these messages should be directed > to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com