From: "Stanley Sidlov" Received: from mxout4.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.168] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 557860 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:35:38 -0500 Received: from mxin1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.175]) by mxout4.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Gnxgo-000GIe-AW for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:35:35 -0500 Received: from admin.nni.com ([216.107.0.100]) by mxin1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Gnxgo-000FJ8-70 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:35:30 -0500 X-Scan:Scanned for Virus By NuNet Received: from [67.81.238.77] (account stanleys@cybernex.net) by admin.nni.com (CommuniGate Pro POP 4.1.8) with XMIT id 541815646; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:35:29 -0500 To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:35:31 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: "Stanley Sidlov" Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2.20.2300 for OS/2 Warp 4.5 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: Verizon FIOS &$^(%&%^&*%^ ????? Message-ID: X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) Here's a URL for the responses to the question I posted at Broadbandreports.com, the nut of it being everything connects using DHCP to the router. (BTW, the second poster is an exceptional member, and lives a town over - my own town won't get FIOS until 2009): http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17337627 On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:06:58 -0500 (EST), Stanley Sidlov wrote: >I don't find in the Verizon forum FAQ anything about windows being required. I do note >that the firmware on some of thier supplied devices may not be up to date and that you may >need to make some changes: >http://www.dslreports.com/faq/verizonfios/3.0_Networking > >Some FIOS areas (NJ is one) not PPoE but plain DHCP service, but that's the router's >problem. And I would say that either the router they are using is not properly configured >to be DHCP to the LAN or is not acting as a NAT/DHCP device. > > >On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:07:11 -0500, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: > >>This is from Julian Thomas who asked me to post this for him, as his >>Verizon account is not yet subscribed o the list for posting: >> >>8<---------------------- snip ---------------------->8 >> >> >>Arrived at my brother's house in Belmont Mass last night. They have VZ >>FIOS and a wired/wireless setup. >> >>Fired up my machine, went wireless, could see the router but nothing >>past it. Went wired, same thing. >> >>Apparently VZ has some windows-only app that needs to be run on each >>machine that connects before it will let you on. >> >>This is not the VZ router, it's my brother's regular linksys box. >> >>Am I screwed or does someone have a workaround other than using one of >>their machines and this creaky webmail interface? >> >>jt >> >> >> >>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >>This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >>To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >>To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to >>Send administrative queries to >>To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to: and >reply to the confirmation email. >> >>This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal >>P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- >>electronic communications related to content >>contained in these messages should be directed >>to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) >> >>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >> >> > > > >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to >Send administrative queries to >To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to: and reply to the confirmation email. > >This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal >P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- >electronic communications related to content >contained in these messages should be directed >to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) > >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > >