From: "Ed Durrant" Received: from mxout3.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.167] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 540920 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 03:13:46 -0500 Received: from mxin1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.175]) by mxout3.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Glhnx-0009Wh-6Z for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 03:13:41 -0500 Received: from omta05ps.mx.bigpond.com ([144.140.83.195]) by mxin1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Glhnw-000Kbr-MW for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 03:13:32 -0500 Received: from [192.168.30.2] (really [124.189.184.88]) by omta05ps.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20061119081320.RWQC19269.omta05ps.mx.bigpond.com@[192.168.30.2]> for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 08:13:20 +0000 Message-ID: <4560121E.5010205@bigpond.net.au> Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:13:18 +1100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0a1 (OS/2/20060803) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: GenMAC 1.6 resp 1.7 / was Getting worse performance with new GenMAC 2.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at omta05ps.mx.bigpond.com from [124.189.184.88] using ID edurrant@bigpond.net.au at Sun, 19 Nov 2006 08:13:20 +0000 X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) SYNass i-lists wrote: > Hi OS2-WL-Users, > Very important hint, according to Marc Dodel & CLA: > > There is NO GenMAC 1.6 resp. 1.7 !!! > GenMAC is only public as V 1.00 and, currently now, V 2.00 !! > > Please stop the discussion with these irregular versions and > concentrate on the supported ones & do read the NETlabs webpages ! > > TIA, best regards & success, I also need it to overcome my WL problems > ;-) > svobi > > Actually 1.6 and 1.7 WERE released for testing to the members of the Genmac-Users list - as most people on this list are probably also members of that list, your statement is incorrect. The full package was 1.0 1.6 and 1.7 were updates to that package. In the majority of users cases only the point releases allowed support of their WLAN cards. Hence comparision between 1.6 / 1.7 and 2.0 is valid. Cheers/2 Ed.