From: "Carl Gehr" Received: from mxout2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.166] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 438527 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:48:20 -0400 Received: from mxin2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.176]) by mxout2.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GZrAF-00078L-6T for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:48:14 -0400 Received: from mail-out1.fuse.net ([216.68.8.174] helo=smtp1.fuse.net) by mxin2.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GZrAE-0003BN-W4 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:47:35 -0400 Received: from gx4.fuse.net ([208.102.7.45]) by smtp1.fuse.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061017154723.DIOG26726.smtp1.fuse.net@gx4.fuse.net> for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:47:23 -0400 Received: from localhost ([208.102.7.45]) by gx4.fuse.net (InterMail vG.1.02.00.02 201-2136-104-102-20041210) with ESMTP id <20061017154722.TVSC11137.gx4.fuse.net@localhost> for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:47:22 -0400 To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:47:19 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: "Carl Gehr" Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2.20.2382 for OS/2 Warp 4.5 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: Another weird motel situation Message-Id: <20061017154722.TVSC11137.gx4.fuse.net@localhost> X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 08:11:58 -0700, Neil Waldhauer wrote: >On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:04:14 -0400 (EDT), "Carl Gehr" > wrote: > >> I guess that, in an emergency, using Web Mail is OK. But, I'd really >> prefer to be able to compose messages offline and using my own copy of >> PMMail to prepare and send the messages. Web Mail is just not that >> convenient when it often includes adding attachments, special [but >> still plain-text] formatting, etc. > >First, your internet provider has to give you an SMTP port you can use from a >hotel. I use a small mom-and-pop ISP in my town, so I'm covered. But big >nation-wide services lag technologically. > >Second, PMMail development has resumed, and that would be a great feature for >you to request. Go to the new PMMail website, and >see if you can add that to the wish list. > PMMail already has the abiltiy to specify a port. [I'm using PMMail 2.20.2382 for OS/2 Warp 4.5] So, what should I ask for? A mini-SMTP server to be built into PMMail? Carl