From: "Steven Levine" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.10) with ESMTP id 11081592 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 12:34:29 -0400 Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([50.73.8.217]:40747 helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by mail.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1t0kV2-0000000041U-19Av for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 12:34:20 -0400 Received: from mta-101b.earthlink-vadesecure.net ([51.81.61.61]:54877 helo=mta-101a.earthlink-vadesecure.net) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1t0kUr-000000005gv-0WNh for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 12:34:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; bh=ora2UnFAN9aqJZcMNEqYoCcK6f+6v4qDdkwgqj ohMpo=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=earthlink.net; h=from:reply-to:subject: date:to:cc:resent-date:resent-from:resent-to:resent-cc:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-unsubscribe-post: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; q=dns/txt; s=dk12062016; t=1729010048; x=1729614848; b=Vjb4oPDDP/ySHCLiwWv01xaZez/ xWcz3RUV9GnwKpIzHR9rWLrnJCRdT7AC6LIg7XbeKvX0SNBsubkYQabeLdX7XprvrgaNghr KhjExNge5RhQuqVeOOurjVRQbKtyxnbEkiLhDlqpXcll8JtuTrgndRjSt+AEKYg8CkGvSK+ BmMSXJLLNlYi7skeq+4UBfjlrHO/YbB+DZtkA8k6YPxPCidqjRdCApMsJjv454ubfOadlCt Hll5UxfVsFWo0p+HUMc4eu6reXSeKm6au5HYpkUEBnQ1rz3F/3zvF6K3XchVyYeuU9OHwri CcAWLloHgFyfxkQXnGyV5zqiBCQzL4g== Received: from slamain ([172.58.117.14]) by vsel1nmtao01p.internal.vadesecure.com with ngmta id e765317e-17fead7a6e1a8f6f; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 16:34:08 +0000 Message-ID: <670ea3b3.23.mr2ice.fgrirsq@earthlink.net> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:17:39 -0800 To: "eCS ISP Mailing List" In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [eCS-ISP] HTTPS-Misery (for Steven) X-Mailer: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v3.00.11.24/60 In , on 10/15/24 at 05:53 PM, "Massimo S." said: Hi Massimo, >i found that i had an issue with the virtual host Hopefully, that was the reason for the bad path. >but i've to retry in the next days >since i'm over the "allmost punitive*" LE re-issue limit There's absolutely no need to have this problem, unless you neglected to read the docs or did not understand the docs and failed to ask questions. You should be using the --staging switch until you get your internal problems resolved. See https://letsencrypt.org/getting-started/ and https://manpages.debian.org/unstable/uacme/uacme.1.en.html Steven -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Steven Levine" Warp/DIY/BlueLion etc. www.scoug.com www.arcanoae.com www.warpcave.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------