From: "Steven Levine" <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com>
Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com)
  by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.10)
  with ESMTP id 11070717 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 16:11:09 -0400
Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([50.73.8.217]:43426 helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com)
	by mail.2rosenthals.com with esmtps  (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.97.1)
	(envelope-from <steve53@earthlink.net>)
	id 1sxu4K-000000000V4-0uU8
	for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com;
	Mon, 07 Oct 2024 16:11:00 -0400
Received: from mta-202a.earthlink-vadesecure.net ([51.81.232.240]:55333)
	by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtps  (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
	(Exim 4.97.1)
	(envelope-from <steve53@earthlink.net>)
	id 1sxu4G-000000002bV-0bEV
	for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com;
	Mon, 07 Oct 2024 16:10:56 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; bh=WSZc2dyX3coCCka5ZZJgeDjEEtqa9EnyS9muNV
 PWW0c=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=earthlink.net; h=from:reply-to:subject:
 date:to:cc:resent-date:resent-from:resent-to:resent-cc:in-reply-to:
 references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-unsubscribe-post:
 list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; q=dns/txt;
 s=dk12062016; t=1728331855; x=1728936655; b=Cw/Pt6iGk8NF2uZ6SmTRY8jI7Et
 qD/JuKTtGHsSBo94hrHNtsWMXF8UUZWxs1Wz6cz1bJ2u0uNi5HYHucvN/dXcf2oYW+Xuce+
 0JCsrEXR210BYzkWkYB7i9ZCrIqv9Sxrm8Io+Rt2f5UcY55460LxoEqHrmFJQqkJiGfHEhK
 YmTaMOdkx6TRuyaE5y/j271XdZpIVtRx1J1CkwD8xvW7/F1DvuKd7HAdalx4TBY8zFpEIa9
 Lt3lnH5jPo21FWPgltYKW0o4tgmzaC0GWEIgbGBcPkzIBQslcmMGgPSKmGk4h51gseCEN4W
 GejXZ71//4SwIL6Vrak46s9vTcrQk8Q==
Received: from slamain ([172.58.119.108])
 by vsel2nmtao02p.internal.vadesecure.com with ngmta
 id 2b3d02e3-17fc44aa3bdd3c78; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 20:10:55 +0000
Message-ID: <67044b5d.26.mr2ice.fgrirsq@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 12:58:05 -0800
To: "eCS ISP Mailing List" <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-11070632@2rosenthals.com>
Subject: Re: [eCS-ISP] HTTPS-Misery
X-Mailer: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v3.00.11.24/60 

In <list-11070632@2rosenthals.com>, on 10/08/24
   at 05:51 AM, "Paul Smedley" <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com> said:

Hi Paul,

>Is there any reason we can't just use uacme.sh ? We have multiple shells
>built for os/2.

To be fair, uacme.sh, as I read it, is intended as a simple sample.  Also,
it's only part of the solution.  On *ix, the preferred solutions seem to
be certbot and dehydrated.

  https://letsencrypt.org/docs/client-options/

indicates a number of other options.  These all contain features for
working with multiple domains, scheduling updates and such.

Steven

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Steven Levine" <steve53@earthlink.net>  Warp/DIY/BlueLion etc.
www.scoug.com www.arcanoae.com www.warpcave.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------