From: "Steven Levine" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.10) with ESMTP id 11070666 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 15:52:49 -0400 Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([50.73.8.217]:43313 helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by mail.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1sxtma-000000008Ft-1Woq for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 15:52:40 -0400 Received: from mta-102b.earthlink-vadesecure.net ([51.81.61.67]:58241 helo=mta-102a.earthlink-vadesecure.net) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1sxtmW-000000002GN-0089 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 15:52:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; bh=td813BEIWbtb7v2neOmePOMpiBB7i0AnORfRM1 Hh3rw=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=earthlink.net; h=from:reply-to:subject: date:to:cc:resent-date:resent-from:resent-to:resent-cc:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-unsubscribe-post: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; q=dns/txt; s=dk12062016; t=1728330755; x=1728935555; b=B2wrQCIcGZ5uhuz/PtxGMwLzt09 LngynauBzKiEO03calI9FNvVsMaKIVD2qA1EiYrRWOGXrz41HCndY3jYb5mlY3aqMkohrHl T/t5igcvFSreuiias3wnFbnSngOoHDtt72OoveqjZgJM1aG9WVEDNAk+MpEkXS51s8LxRtm JJ51UWPtlSjJv/igJT/7F7QFUtjrY7DxfYhk5oud14mZpeP+2+b/gQMo5gdoa98c1TlflY4 0BEat2piOPMHC84o4UzRaqMMFzrRyj1tnnB6A20YbP+j7ok+Ohc2yI1aCCGxdvDn9Z0Ge0b 8Co/D2u10CMqJgnBORtzVGCUKRAErSQ== Received: from slamain ([172.58.119.108]) by vsel1nmtao02p.internal.vadesecure.com with ngmta id 1fe8424a-17fc43aa1d127351; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 19:52:35 +0000 Message-ID: <67044869.24.mr2ice.fgrirsq@earthlink.net> Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 12:45:29 -0800 To: "eCS ISP Mailing List" In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [eCS-ISP] HTTPS-Misery X-Mailer: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v3.00.11.24/60 In , on 10/07/24 at 09:18 PM, "Massimo S." said: Hi Massimo, >they changed the behaviour on September 2024, >the scripts are working since 3 years (or more) Only because you chose to implement a naive script and got lucky. There's nothing in the RFCs that specifies the order that the request methods are offered. Anyone using the DNS-01 or TLS-SNI-01 or TLS-ALPN-01 request methods implemented their hook scripts to not assume their chosen method was the first offered. Steven -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Steven Levine" Warp/DIY/BlueLion etc. www.scoug.com www.arcanoae.com www.warpcave.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------