From: "Steven Levine" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.10) with ESMTP id 2480223 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 16 May 2026 18:29:29 -0400 Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([50.73.8.217]:48539 helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by mail.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wONVY-000000001kr-0pTP for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 16 May 2026 18:29:20 -0400 Received: from mta-101b.earthlink-vadesecure.net ([51.81.61.61]:44015 helo=mta-101a.earthlink-vadesecure.net) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wONVV-000000003XJ-0Xq3 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 16 May 2026 18:29:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; bh=sLbYjJ+3AH9XIsSwuKvdhfZv7gIK0tzcS8pRX/ vt170=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=earthlink.net; h=from:reply-to:subject: date:to:cc:resent-date:resent-from:resent-to:resent-cc:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-unsubscribe-post: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; q=dns/txt; s=dk12062016; t=1778970556; x=1779575356; b=LqPuSz/OAKcQraUhQU94IimFkDO HrDKVwtqWvriorqlbaD6echVTnZy1/5qDQszCLam98PtNIsNJfMgUMejeasyHHGjxFOmjza tNw+SlWFELuvaytzt0JiiZz9GiE07t8RCJXRlGa0XrEgU43XOxZ8dzmc/NCCvlMZL9wGIOt iLP6assxqxUaLuO/w80+tkSp0orwVgd33YVOJUKJiVmRb9Pb4wF47H9I6E7MGGzPD7NmJra FizjrML6wfO6PR5eIpLIuEtNfG5IPTJfhyVnfpyo/ne9e9Qjcjkd/n7/8wh36GyzG2ptyW5 Z5k2GGSmCmn7H4TRFdpHATLSUqnShXw== Received: from slamain ([107.202.224.188]) by vsel1nmtao01p.internal.vadesecure.com with ngmta id 904f5180-18b02c4b6f5a5319; Sat, 16 May 2026 22:29:16 +0000 Message-ID: <6a08ee07.6.mr2ice.fgrirsq@earthlink.net> Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 15:21:59 -0700 To: "eCS ISP Mailing List" In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [eCS-ISP] SSL cert lifetime X-Mailer: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v3.00.11.24/60 In , on 05/16/26 at 05:33 PM, "Lewis G Rosenthal" said: Hi, >Still, it seems to me that there should be a better way to ensure >security without having to "change the lock" every few days to make sure >that any lost keys don't get misappropriated. It would be nice if someone came up with such a solution. It's a task that's way above my pay grade. IMO, it's only going to get harder since we seem to have entered another of those times where system capabilities are again increasing exponentially. Steven -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Steven Levine" Warp/DIY/BlueLion etc. www.scoug.com www.arcanoae.com www.warpcave.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------