From: "Steven Levine" <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com>
Message-ID: <672d1cbe.32.mr2ice.fgrirsq@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 12:02:06 -0800
To: "eCS ISP Mailing List" <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-11208013@2rosenthals.com>
Subject: Re: [eCS-ISP] ClamAV (0.103.10) perfomances

In <list-11208013@2rosenthals.com>, on 11/07/24
   at 09:34 AM, "Massimo S." <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com> said:

Hi Massimo,

>that doc is strange, i use my VMs (except one) with more than one CPU and
>they work correctly
>i've never seen guest OS lockup, never had data loss, etc.

This is not strange at all.  AN is not saying your chosen setup will not
work for you.  What they are saying is that they do not support VBox
setups configured with more than one CPU.  If you have such a setup and it
works for you, that's great.  If you happen to have issues, you are one
our own, unless you can replicate the issue on a single CPU setup.

>i've also seen that putting VM containers on 4th generation NVME storage
>improves perfomances *a lot*
>i use a single NVME for every VM, so I/O are at the best

This is pretty much expected, SInce the VM is emulating the hardware that
OS/2 thinks it is running, the faster the underlying physical hardware,
the better the VM will perform, assuming everything works as intended.


Steven

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Steven Levine" <steve53@earthlink.net>  Warp/DIY/BlueLion etc.
www.scoug.com www.arcanoae.com www.warpcave.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------